Tallangatta Valley Caring For Our Country EverGraze Supporting Site (Janet and Stuart Morant)

Improving pasture productivity in hill country

Fast Facts

Establishing new pastures at Tallangatta Valley
The Tallangatta Valley EverGraze Supporting Site group inspects the newly established perennial pastures in Spring, 2008.

Site Location: Tallangatta, North East Victoria
Rainfall: 890mm
Farm area: 400 ha
Host producers: Janet and Stuart Morant
Enterprises: Spring calving crossbred cows (54 cows), 120 weaners, and Poll Dorset stud autumn lambing ewes (1900)
Producer group: Tallangatta Valley Landcare group
Site Coordinator: Jim Moll (2007-2008), Jeff Hirth (2008-2012)

Site focus

Establishment, production, persistence and cost analysis of summer dormant tall fescue and cocksfoot pasture mix and landclass fencing to manage less arable parts of the landscape.

Key points

  • Native species on upper slopes were better managed through deferred grazing and land class fencing.
  • Establishment of perennial species (winter active tall fescue and cocksfoot) on the lower slopes improved productivity, but the two species were not compatible for management in a mix.
  • Reducing paddock size and implementing rotational grazing helped to increase pasture utilisation and stocking rates.


The Morant’s run livestock including 500 Poll Dorset stud ewes on their property near Tallangatta, Victoria.
The Morant’s run livestock including 500 Poll Dorset stud ewes on their property near Tallangatta, Victoria.

The farm is located on the floor and eastern slopes of the Tallangatta Valley, with Tallangatta Creek flowing across the front of the property.

The upper slopes of the Tallangatta Valley have largely remained covered with native vegetation, particularly native grasses. This is because the soils are strongly acidic (pHCa = 3.8-4.0), relatively infertile (Olsen P = 4-10 mg/kg) and lightly textured. Traditionally, there has been little pasture improvement on this steeper country because of poor accessibility, limited water supplies and the need for ground cover over summer and autumn.

The Morant’s had found that perennial ryegrass pastures did not persist and so have sown much of the arable area of their property to phalaris. However, phalaris toxicity in the autumn is a risk for their stud ewes, and areas of the farm are extremely acidic and high in aluminium, making them unsuitable for phalaris, so they were looking to try an alternative persistent perennial.

The area chosen for the Supporting Site was a single 21ha paddock, low in fertility, very acid and covered with a mixture of native perennial grasses (predominately Microleana) and introduced annual species such as sub clover. The site had a mix of undulating country suited to establishment, and steeper country between two ridges that was better managed to promote the existing native perennials.

At the start of the Supporting Site, the Morant’s found that it was difficult to utilise the paddock and prevent bare ground on the upper slopes due to the variation in land classes in the paddock.


The control paddock on Morants property
The control paddock on Morants property

The Supporting Site paddock was fenced to divide the steep native pasture from the undulating area suited to pasture establishment.

The arable section was tilled with a chisel plough, limed (3.6 tonne/ha) and sprayed in preparation for sowing. A mix of winter active tall fescue (cv. Origin, 8 kg/ha), summer active cocksfoot (cv. Oxen, 8.5 kg/ha) and sub clover (cv. Riverina, 6.1 kg/ha and Goulburn, 6.5 kg/ha) were sown. [Note, these sowing rates are higher than recommended. Cocksfoot would normally be sown at around 3 kg/ha in a mix, with tall fescue at around 10 kg/ha. Sub clover would normally be sown at around 8 kg/ha total.]

The new pasture and the fenced off native area were included in a rotational grazing system.

A neighboring paddock was left unfenced and was set stocked for the duration of the demonstration.


The standard EverGraze Supporting Site Quickchecks protocol was implemented. Measurements were as follows:

  • Pasture condition – availability (kg/ha), composition, ground cover, perennial species persistence (basal cover)
  • Grazing days (DSE/ha) were recorded using the recorder calculator in the EverGraze Feedbase Planning and Budgeting Tool.
  • Soil testing
  • Expenses – capital and variable costs

What was found

Soil tests

Soil tests at the beginning of the demonstration revealed that soils were very acid with pH below 4 in CaCl and aluminium levels more than 20% and up to 38% in the Control (Tables 1-3). 3.6 tonne/ha lime was applied prior to sowing the new pasture. This brought the pH up to 4.8 in 2010 and 5.0 by 2012, and reduced aluminium levels to 6.2%. 100kg/ha of super phosphate was applied at sowing and 150 kg/ha was applied as maintenance in the subsequent years. Higher production could be achieved by further increasing phosphorus with capital super applications in the improved pasture.

Table 1. Soil tests from Sown paddock at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

Test Unit 12/12/2007 10/05/2010 10/05/2012
pH (CaCl) 3.8 4.8 5
Organic Carbon % 4.8 3.26 3.1
Phosphorus Buffering Index 117 86.8
Olsen Phosphorus mg/kg 9.1 8 8.6
Sulphur (KCL 40) mg/kg 13.5 7.6 8.5
Potassium (Colwell) mg/kg 250 219 235
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g 8.78 6.8
Calcium meq/100g 52.40% 80.00%
Magnesium meq/100g 10.70% 6.90%
Potassium meq/100g 7.40% 6.30%
Sodium meq/100g 6.70% 0.60%
Aluminium meq/100g 22.40% 6.20%


Table 2. Soil tests from Hill paddock at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

Test Unit 12/12/2007 10/05/2010 10/05/2012
pH (CaCl) 4.2 4.3 4.1
Organic Carbon % 3.8 3.52 4.1
Phosphorus Buffering Index 114 128.7
Olsen Phosphorus mg/kg 8.1 5.3 7.9
Sulphate Sulphur mg/kg 9.5 3.4 7.3
Potassium mg/kg 233 281 316
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g 7.02 6.14
Calcium meq/100g 53.00% 48.00%
Magnesium meq/100g 11.10% 17.80%
Potassium meq/100g 7.50% 11.20%
Sodium meq/100g 3.00% 0.50%
Aluminium meq/100g 25.40% 22.50%


Table 3. Soil tests from Control paddock at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

Test Unit 12/12/2007 10/05/2010 10/05/2012
pH (CaCl) 4 3.9
Organic Carbon % 3.15 3.9
Phosphorus Buffering Index 121
Olsen Phosphorus mg/kg 6.9 6.8
Sulphate Sulphur mg/kg 4.7 8.8
Potassium mg/kg 244 242
Cation Exchange Capacity meq/100g 4.2
Calcium meq/100g 39.50%
Magnesium meq/100g 7.90%
Potassium meq/100g 13.80%
Sodium meq/100g 0.70%
Aluminium meq/100g 38.10%

Rainfall was above average

Rainfall was above average for the duration of the Supporting Site (Figure 1). Of note were the wet summers of 2009/10, 2010/11 and 2011/12, which created favourable conditions for the summer active cocksfoot and the native Microlaena pasture.

Figure 1. Rainfall at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site
Figure 1. Rainfall at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

The new pasture more than doubled stocking rate

Grazing days are calculated by recording the number of animals x the number days grazed x the dry sheep equivalent (DSE) rating of the stock class and dividing by the number of hectares in the paddock. This number can be further divided by the number of days in the year to provide an average annual stocking rate (DSE/ha), and this is provided in Table 1.

The new pasture was first grazed 11 months after it was sown. It carried 18.9 DSE/ha for 2009, 40.6 DSE/ha for 2010 and 23.5 DSE/ha for 2011.

The rotationally grazed native pasture on the steeper slope (previously part of the same paddock) was rested for summer/autumn each year and carried on average 2.4 DSE/ha in 2009, 5.2 DSE/ha in 2010 and 12.5 DSE/ha in 2011.

The set stocked native pasture in the paddock next door, which was not fenced to land class, carried 7.5 DSE/ha in 2009, 10.6 DSE/ha in 2010 and 14.6 DSE/ha in 2011.

Table 4. Grazing days and average annual stocking rates of Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

Improved pasture Rotationally grazed  Native pasture Rotationally grazed  Native pasture Set-stocked
  Grazing days (DSE/ha) Annual average (DSE/ha) Grazing days (DSE/ha) Annual average (DSE/ha) Grazing days (DSE/ha) Annual average (DSE/ha)
May – December 2008 0 0 1,900 7.9 2,560 10.6
January – December 2009 6,900* 18.9 880 2.4 2,720 7.5
January – December 2010 14,820 40.6 1,880 5.2 3,860 10.6
January – December 2011 8,590 23.5 4,560 12.5 5,330 14.6
January – April 2012 1,220 10.1 370 3.1 2,020 16.8
Total 31,510 9,590 16,490

* first grazed May 2009.

Microlaena persisted under set stocking and rotational grazing

Basal cover of native grasses (predominately Microlaena) was measured at nine fixed grid points in each paddock and is presented in Figure 2. Basal cover is the percentage of 81 grid intersects (at each fixed point) with a tiller base from a perennial plant (see the Supporting Site measurement protocol for details). The results show that with the exception of May 2010, there was no benefit to basal cover from providing a summer/autumn rest to native pastures compared to set stocking. However, the large boost in Microlaena perennial basal cover with high summer rainfall in 2010/11 is consistent with results from Proof Sites at Holbrook, Chiltern and Orange, and Supporting Sites at Warrak and Murmungee. These sites also found that while benchmarks for destocking at 70% ground cover and 800 kg/ha DM were in place, there was no benefit of rotational grazing to the persistence of Microlaena.

Figure 2. Basal cover at fixed points for native pastures (predominately Microlaena) at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site
Figure 2. Basal cover at fixed points for native pastures (predominately Microlaena) at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

Cocksfoot and tall fescue – not a good mix

Plant frequency is the measure of presence or absence of a tiller base in each of the grid squares and is presented for cocksfoot and tall fescue in Figure 3. The tall fescue and cocksfoot proved difficult to manage together. The tall fescue seeded earlier than the cocksfoot, making it unpalatable from mid-spring. The cocksfoot was selectively grazed at that time of year, leaving the fescue to grow tall and rank. The wet spring/summers also meant that the cocksfoot grew ahead of the dormant tall fescue, and dominated the pasture (Figure 3). It is likely that the dominance of cocksfoot was also due to the very high seeding rate used. The fescue grew faster than the cocksfoot during autumn/winter and this was the time of most limiting feed.

Figure 3. Frequency (presence/absence) of tall fescue and cocksfoot pastures at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site
Figure 3. Frequency (presence/absence) of tall fescue and cocksfoot pastures at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

Tallangatta - DSC_0208 Tallangatta - DSC_0206
Tall fescue pastures went rank earlier in the spring leaving cocksfoot pastures to be selectively grazed.

In future, the Morant’s plan to try a winter active tall fescue as the only grass in the seed mix, and focus on grazing it harder in early spring, while its palatability and digestibility is still high. The sub clover content of the sown pasture has remained stable and adequate (17-18 %). Among the locals, this ‘very ordinary’ paddock typifies what many of them have up the back of their farms. They were very impressed with how well the new pasture had established, which gave them the confidence to have a go at their own ‘ordinary’ paddocks to see what they can do with them.

In sowing down new pastures, especially on new or tough areas, it is quite common to sow a range of species to capture the strengths and weaknesses of the soil types. Many retailers sell seed mixes with a range of species in the mix. In 2005, a survey of 61 paddocks was carried out (Virgona, unpublished). The survey looked at the pasture species sown in the Murrumbidgee and Murray catchments in NSW, in areas where annual rainfall was greater than 550 mm. For each paddock, details of sowing rates and consequent management were collected and a soil test taken. Each paddock was then assessed for composition, feed availability and the frequency of the sown species. Using this information, the scientists looked at the persistence of sown species and the advantages of sowing multiple species. On average most farmers sowed five species in each paddock, but on assessing the pastures later, only two species on average (including clovers) contributed most of the dry matter. In no pasture did they find that the five sown species persisted at any appreciable level. This study highlights that, rather than using ‘shot-gun mixes’ it is best to sow a single grass species (with appropriate legumes) suited to the right part of the landscape, and to tailor management to the persistence and production of that species.

Investing in water

The Morant’s found that the rotational grazing system significantly improved utilisation of their pastures, but a key issue was getting water to the paddocks. A gravitational tank was therefore installed at the top of the paddock to gravitate water into troughs. A mono pump was used to push the water up a 200m head for over a kilometer to the gravitational tank.

“Investing in the water system was the first step in the renovation program. — if you haven’t got the water you can’t run your stock and utilise your pastures effectively. I guess it has taken a lot of water and wire, but the difference it makes to the pastures and the livestock is substantial. Paddocks of 160 hectares or so were good land areas to manage 20 years ago, but since then things have gotten tighter and we need to be increasing our efficiency through smaller paddocks and rotational grazing.”

Crunching the numbers

The EverGraze Supporting Site at Tallangatta Valley clearly showed that improved perennial pastures can be successfully established on the more challenging soil types. But successful establishment comes at a high cost, in this case $902/ha (including fencing). This included $145/ha to develop (fence and water) the 21 hectare site, $470/ha to cultivate, lime and spray eight hectares of the site and $287/ha for sowing, seed and fertiliser for pasture establishment. The sown paddock was top-dressed with 150 kg/ha single super (at a cost of $51/ha/year) each subsequent year.

Full details of the economic analysis (including all assumptions used) are provided in the case study Improving pasture productivity in hill country, Stuart and Janet Morant. Cumulative cash flow for the investment is presented in Figure 4.

In this scenario, it is assumed that stocking rate before and after the investment is 8 DSE/ha and 21 DSE/ha respectively. Gross margin is $30/DSE both before and after the improvement. The results show that improving the investment will result in peak debt occurring in the second year after establishment, due to the purchase of extra stock. It will take over eight years for the investment to pay for itself.

Figure 4. Net cumulative cash flow at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site
Figure 4. Net cumulative cash flow at Tallangatta Valley Supporting Site

The internal rate of return is shown in Table 5. In this analysis, it is assumed the investment is for 10 years, there is a 75% salvage value of extra stock, pasture improvement and fencing, and a discount rate of 10%. The IRR is 23%.

Table 5. Gross Margins, and Return on capital (as Internal Rate of Return) estimated for the improved pasture at Tallangatta, compared to business as usual (the native pastures).

Business as usual Improved pasture
Stocking rate when potential (DSE/ha) 8 21
GM/ha at potential ($/ha) 240 630
Value of investment (compared to business as usual
Return on capital (IRR) 23%

For a simple cost-benefit analysis of pasture improvements, use the EverGraze Pasture Improvement Calculator.


Thanks to Janet and Stuart Morant for hosting the site. This site was supported by Meat and Livestock Australia, Caring for Our Country, Agriculture Victoria and Future Farm Industries CRC through the National EverGraze Project.

logo caring for our country CHAF-large
MLA_logo-large  Agriculture-Victoria_logo_300

Demonstration and Case Studies


Generating PDF - please wait

NOTE: Depending on the size of the page this may take a while (Click on "Cancel" to stop PDF generation)